On 8/5/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> I have attached it to the bug. > > Thanks. But: It's not ready yet, but what do you think of it? > > It is not ready yet :)
Didn't I (also) send you a much later version? > No seriously I think the idea with having the column width in *_width is > fine. I would add a calculation of it based on COLUMS if and only if COLUMNS > is > 80 and --wide is given. I am not sure how to react if output is not a > tty. One option is to always asume a very wide line, the other is to stick > with columns. For beeing compatible with parsing scripts I think the output > without wide option should not change (however I think everybody who is > arsing netstat output is insane) The later version auto-sets the wide option if there's a tty and detects the width of the tty.
