On Aug 18, Lars Bahner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, > > Please CC: me as I am not on this list! > > As I upgraded rscheme today to the final non-beta version I ran into > problems with the version numbering. > > Eg: > old version (0.7.3.3.b30-1) in unstable >= new version (0.7.3.3-1) > > > Upstream names the betas for 0.7.3.3 as 0.7.3.3.b1-b30 - as you no doubt > already guessed. > > So now that there is no beta-versioning, the installer sees this as a > lower number. I could of cource number the package as 0.7.3.3.c or > 0.7.3.3.final, but I was wondering what The Right Thing To Do would be.
In the future, if you modify upstream's name of 0.7.3.4.b1 to be 0.7.3.4b1 instead, then 0.7.3.4.0 will be treated as a later version. I think that is pretty clean, and no need to wait for the ~ capability. -- Neil Roeth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]