Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The document does not endorse using unstable. It clearly encourages to > use stable. But if one wants to choose between unstable and testing then > it says to go with unstable.
It's fine to give reasons why unstable might be preferable given such a choice (though your general tone seems somewhat unfairly biased against testing -- you make it sound scarier that it really is). But the sentence "Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing" is nonsensical; just get rid of it. -miles -- 97% of everything is grunge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
