On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:03:21 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 21:16]: > > My preference is for slang-foo, as it is more visible that it is > > a slang-related, rather than a generic DSO; slang-gdbm is more > > interesting to a slang developer than to a gdbm one, and this shows that. Right. > I would keep the first version really short. The only two things that > are important for now is the package naming, the installation directory > for the modules, and maybe the dependency relationships. The upstream > Makefile for slgdbm installs the module in > /usr/share/slsh/local-packages, but I moved it to /usr/share/slsh. Rather it installs the module in /usr/local/lib/slang/v2/modules, and a gdbm.sl script in /usr/local/share/slsh/local-packages, which is probably what you mean. > Do you think this is correct? As regards dependency relationships, > slgdbm has: > Suggests: slsh (>= 2.0) | jed (>= 0.99.17) | slrn (>= 0.9.8.1pl1-4) > I do not know whether this is appropriate or not. Well, it is possible to compile the gdbm module with slang 1 - of course you'd have to edit the Makefile to install in v1/modules. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
