* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050928 14:54]: > Wouldn't it be possible to do the following: teTeX-3.0 is uploaded to > unstable, including the libkpathsea4 and libkpathsea4-dev packages (it > uses the library itself), but at the same time libkpathsea3 and > libkpathsea-dev are still available as oldlibs, AND libkpathsea4-dev > does *not* provide libkpathsea-dev.
That would work for the library issue, and would "only" makes some packages FTBFS because tetex changed (but I can think we can live with that). Even better, if you do it right, you can change the libkpathsea-dev to libkpathsea4-dev if TeTeX-3.0 has reached testing, and then the depending programs will slowly flow in (and that library transition wouldn't be as blocking as a normal one). Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
