* Simon Josefsson: >> I think you might get broader support in the vendor community if you >> make the license for modified copying non-copyleft. > > Yes, that is the intention. Requiring a copyleft license is likely to > meet with disapproval from too many people, for various reasons.
But isn't the "this notice [...] preserved" part problematic? | The Contributor grants third parties the right to copy and distribute | the Contribution, with or without modification, in any medium, | without royalty, provided that the copyright notice and this notice | are preserved, and that any claims of being the authorative RFC are | removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]