> On Tuesday 08 November 2005 02:26, Erast Benson wrote: >> > Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> If you do not see something specific, or newer versions, like(you can >> >> find >> >> debarchiver-0.3 but we have debarchiver-0.4 packaged), that means it >> is >> >> not committed yet and we are testing it right now and will be >> committed >> >> shortly. >> > >> > Erast, >> > >> > Unless you provide a written offer, good for three years, to supply >> the >> > source on request, you *must* provide the source code for a binary >> > alongside the binary. That means that the source code for a specific >> > version of the binary must be downloadable before you can provide that >> > binary. Providing binaries without the appropriate source code (as >> > required under 3(a) of the GPL) or a written offer for the same (GPL >> > 3(b)) is a violation of the license, and thus infringes the copyright >> of >> > the authors. >> >> OK. point taken. This will be "fixed" soon. Hopefully in Alpha 1, which >> bits is planned to be release by the end of this week. > > Sorry, this is another violation. The source comes first, then binaries > next > to it. Hm, I wonder how could you make people believe (trust>) in your > "open > source" project ?
All corresponding sources available at http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources. Download page has a link to the /sources directory. And from now on, we are going to publish source code first, than binaries. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
