Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051123 15:51]:
>> - binNMU version scheme changed
>>
>> The developer reference _still_ states binNMU should be versioned as
>> 1.2-3.0.1. The DAK will no longer accept this.
>
> I am sorry that the developers reference is a bit lagging currently. Do
> you have some new wording available, or do you want till I find time to
> fix it myself?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
> --
> http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
I can give it a shot and send you a draft for it.
>From a technical point I'm unsure how the following version will
(sbuild) and should (dak) be handled:
old version binNMU version?
1.2 1.2-0+b1
1.2-3.0.1 1.2-3.0.1+b1
I bet the later will confuse wanna-build, sbuild and the dak and just
require a new maintainer upload or source NMU instead. But is the
former one correct?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
