Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > Jérôme Marant wrote: > >> What is this supposed to mean? If no comments have been made by the >> author for eight weeks, messages will be automatically declassified? >> It looks like a kind of opt out to me. > > True. It may be an idea to have another proposed amendment reversing the > logic, and see how the people decide.
I agree. > [two paragraphs about redacting articles] > >> Why is this necessary in addition to the following paragraph? Maybe I >> did not understand correctly. > > I think it's meant to show that there is the option of removing personal > information but leaving the remainder of the post unchanged. If no such > paragraph were present, people would simply say no and not think about > the option. It's not a formal necessity, but since this GR is not going > to become part of the constitution but rather a guideline on how to act, > it is a good thing to spell everything out. I see. Thank you. >>> - the list of posts to be declassified will be made available to >>> developers two weeks before publication, so that the decisions > >> Two weeks is too short to review, IMO. > > I didn't read that as a hard time limit between announcement and > publication, but rather as the minimum wait time. I'd like a confirmation if possible. Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant