Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> > What problems are there today with buildd administration, please? >> One obvious problem is that there is no documented contact address (just >> search for "buildd" on http://www.debian.org/intro/organization). One >> has to know by some magic who is responsible for which architecture. > > Well, there are mail aliasses for each arch following the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] scheme, but don't expect miracles from it (beside > that sometimes problems seem to just go away silently ;)).
http://bugs.debian.org/342548 Why hasn't that been done before? Where else should this be documented? > Another possible resource might be http://www.buildd.net/ </adv> ;) - I try > to keep the information there as uptodate as possible, but it depends on the > will to cowork with the buildd admins/porters, too. Ah, that's even better, there's actual names behind the buildd's. I'll add that to the patch. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer