Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:19:46AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> I'm not saying that this all needs to be publicly logged. I don't give >> a rat's ass whether it is or not. But please don't stand there saying >> that the process is completely transparent. > > I don't believe I said that. I don't believe it's remotely fair to set > the standard at the unreachable level of perfection, either. > > The major task of buildd maintenance (aiui) is handlings logs though, > and that's certainly what was being complained about earlier. I'd > be interested to see you name an area that's had anything like the > transparency w-p provides the build process though. I guess there's > britney, which gives public logs of what's going on, but also requires > a degree of handholding every now and then that isn't particularly logged. > > Cheers, > aj
Which in no way provides any transparency to <arch>@buildd.d.o, which was being complained about earlier. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]