On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:36:06 +0000, Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole - > thing, so apologies if it shows up in some weird place in threaded > view. > Basically - I dont think the brand should be put on ubuntu as a > whole - feel free to target those people specifically you see not > contributing - but remember - it's a two way thing - and there are > people not willing to cooperate on both sides. > *dons asbestos underwear and waits for replies* > Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:19:42 -0500, Frans Jessop >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> >>> Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful >>> if all DD's worked through it on their projects? >> >> >> Sure, as long as they change lauchpad to meet my workflow >> requirements. This would mean letting me have a local repo, signed >> remote repos, arch, email only interfaces, and not getting into my >> way. If they make changes to meet these requirements, I'll have >> absolutely no problem throwing away tools I have worked on honing >> for a decade or so and switching to launchpad. Oh, and release >> launchpad under a free license, of course, so I don't make Debian >> development rely on a non-free toolset, of course. >> >> >>> Wouldn't that keep things more organized and efficient? Or >>> perhaps Debian could build its own version of launchpad which is >>> better. Again, I think it would do a good job keeping everything >>> organized an efficient. >> >> >> Yup. Having all humans speak just a single language (and none of >> these darned wide charset junk) would be way more efficient too. >> And just have one model of a car -- I mean, who needs all these >> different companies, so much inefficiency. >> >> BTW, thanks for the laugh. >> OK. Since you selected my post to reply to -- are you implying that choosing not to use a propreitary, non-free, repository system for primary debian development, and abandoning my decade old workflow processes constitute non-cooperation? manoj -- You will pay for your sins. If you have already paid, please disregard this message. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]