Hi, On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:38:03PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Oops. I think I was careless. ... > > It looks like "synclient" is not always used. > > Be really careful then! We have to synchronize uploads when the shared > memory segment layout of the driver changes.
Hey, I hope I was not too careless :-) > <download, build, run, inspect> I guess from the upstream. > Oh, wait. Gsynaptics already includes a different (much older) version > of struct SynapticsSHM. It won't work with the current synaptics driver > available in etch. Yep. > I tested 0.9.5 here that destroyed my runtime configuration :) > Probably taking synaptics.h from the driver sources and stripping the > unnecessary definitions (the non public part, see comments) is enough. Well, adjusting such differences are part of maintainership, I guess. I hope I did a useful job. gsynaptics (0.9.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial package for Debian based on the work of Ikuya Awashiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Ubuntu with minor changes such as removing unused dpatch dependency. (closes: Bug#352303) * Update shared memory structure to match Debian xfree86-driver-synaptics-0.14.4-1 . -- Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:50:33 +0900 > BTW: I'll soon upload a new revision recommending [gk]synaptics. Hey, that sounds very interesting. If you see your packages does better job under GTK library environment, let me know. I will be happy to give way to your gsynaptics to avoid name space conflict. Keep me updated. Osamu PS: I am slow in responding to e-mail these days. Give me at least 10 days before getting annoyed. Oh, please make sure to respond to the BTS. Then I can easily check it from the web. Gmail spam filter is sometimes too aggressive. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]