-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Come on, please stop arguing with random, unsuited comparisons, and use common sense : what's the purpose of ndiswrapper without non-free drivers to use it on? We've always put things of the like in contrib, and if we stop doing it, we can remove contrib entirely.
The purpose of ndiswrapper is to run non-free Windows drivers on Linux. The same is more or less true for wine and dosemu (otherwise we would probably make a native version of said apps).
Would the situation change (contrib-wise) if ndiswrapper were integrated into the kernel? Would we want to split the ndiswrapper part to contrib then?
- -- - -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD95rRVYan35+NCKcRAk9/AKCz0PEtSLrjUfa2JHUSxFp1GC3yGwCg5gfT S18zHSeAQGSETSaZfkyPmps= =f4Pu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
