On Feb 19, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed. It has with the fact there is no reasonable use of ndiswrapper > that doesn't imply installing (and running) non-free software on the > host machine. The key here is "reasonable". This is a practical case, > not something to build up theories on fantasmatic uses that don't have > any kind of possible application. This is an interesting argument, but which has no fundament in the SC and policy and so is not relevant for the purpose of determining if a package is acceptable for main.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
