Em Sáb, 2006-03-18 às 23:17 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu: > Yes. However, I think that 'setting up buildd' is the least difficult > of those tasks. It is by far more difficult to produce patches for all > 'standard debian packages' that make them first of all, cross-compile > correctly, and (only) then make them uClibc-friendly.
Sorry, I don't get it. Debian has support for several architectures, why a sub-arch would be harder? Many packages will just work. Remember that in such sub-arch, we can have uclibc-dev replacing libc6-dev, solving the builddeps... Have you ever seen uwoody[1]? there are not so many patches as you're claiming to be necessary... I'm really lost about what are you talking about... [1] http://people.debian.org/~andersee/uwoody/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
