Greetings, Please tell me if I have this right: * You don't like .la files * So you're unilaterally removing them from a core package (libxcursor) with dozens of reverse-depends, breaking all of them * Even though they're a years-old and very well established technology * Which upstream libtool has not yet decided to eliminate ("It's already under discussion") * And which has not been discussed on debian-devel or any other Debian list as far as I can tell (Google search).
Can you really be serious? For example, if the maintainer of GLib decides (s)he doesn't like the way it handles modules, and upstream *might* at some point change the behavior, is that alone enough justification to change it and break all of its dozens of reverse-depending packages? -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]