Scripsit Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 07:56:18PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: >> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 19:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > Having the metapackage kicked out of testing and having the release team >> > refuse to help you get it back into the release because you ignored their >> > recommendations is, however, not subjective. >> What if metapackages only recommended? > I have a hard time imagining how this differs positively from tasksel's task > support. Can tasksel tasks be manipulated programmatically with the same apt/aptitude inferfaces that metapackages can? If yes: Then how do they differ from packages, and how to we need a secondary concept at all? If no: Then I would very much like to keep the metapackages I use as ordinary packages, thank you. -- Henning Makholm "Punctuation, is? fun!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]