"Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that it is unreasonable for the PTS to be updated before
the
policy package actually hits the mirrors.
There is a period of time after a package leaves incomming but before the
mirrors are updated when the package is difficult to
obtain.
Frankly, I updated it a bit soon, right, but that was only because 3.7.2
revert the cgi-lib stuff and the PTS will let people notice that there's a
newer version and that they must take care...
And do we really need to complain of something that is broken for a
few hours and that's will resolve itself alone in a few hours?
/me wishes people wouldn't complain when we're actually fast
I was not complaining. I was suggesting that the actions that were taken be
avoided in general.
It realy is not a big deal, and you are right that complaining about
excessive speed is
nearly absurd considering the last release cycle. Especially considering the
context,
what was done is reasonable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
