-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for all your answers, my package successfully transformed
to its new name with apt-get dist-upgrade in my test environment :-)
One last question: would it be safe to say
Architecture: all
in the dummy transition package since it does not contain
any architecture specific files anymore, or is it better to
leave it as it is with "Architecture: any" to create
architecture specific packages?
Thanks,
Andreas
Andreas Fester wrote:
[...]
> Problem:
>
> Upstream application (non-library) has changed its name.
> I want to reflect this new name in the debian
> package name while ensuring that apt-get dist-upgrade
> works seamless and pulls in the new package.
[...]
- --
Andreas Fester
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.littletux.net
ICQ: 326674288
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEfKAjZ3bQVzeW+rsRAvAjAJ4tt0rYSHmlywQO82aRQJih5DdhWwCgokrE
vtZ+1nRwH4/ltgXX8E8adtM=
=EZaw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
