Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:17:23AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > So in summary, if you don't care about portability to 64-bit windows,
>> > assuming sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long) is just fine.
>>
>> Unless you compile with range checking pointers.
>
> The current implementation of range checking in gcc (mudflap) uses
> normal-sized pointers.
>
> --
> Falk
Even in 32bit? How do they cram all that info in there?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
