On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your > skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in what they do if not > how they do it.
Well, when apt-cacher started out, it needed an apache installation to work and I did not see that as a good replacement for apt-proxy, and it lacked many of apt-proxy's features. It looks like it has grown many of these features now so maybe it might be mature enough to retire apt-proxy. It isn't really possible to merge the existing code since the implementations are so different. Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
