On Saturday 29 July 2006 18:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote: -cut-- > It could go either way, of course, but I was referring to the > difference between due diligence of a group, as opposed to an > individual; potentially, a team is only as strong as the weakest > link.
`weakest link' is not always the case for each package release. It might happens that only `strongest links' has been involved in a package release also. Furthermore, a single maintainer could also has a `bad day' and produce a bad package release. So, I don't believe there is unified formula to measure how much a team is being strong, it all boils down to have a good communication inside the group. You will hadly have a good rollover with a single maintainer..., well except NMUers and Hijackers. > So in some cases the quality of uploads may actually fall, or > impose greater burdens on the members inclined towards higher > quality. Yes, we deal with human beings, which are all different sometimes ;-) -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
