Em Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:47:09 -0300 Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > e.g. > > build: test_stable patch build-stamp > > instead of > > build: patch build-stamp > > That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it > more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very > much :-D It does not look right to me, though.. what about buildds? And what about people forgetting an exported variable saying yes? I much rather the manual solution, or a solution for dak that detects that the target distribution changed and requests a confirmation by signed email, for instance. See you, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~kov/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
