On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:02:41PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not all of them are buggy, e.g. ssh, inn and inn2 have the directory in > > the package but also create it in the init script if needed. > > I would consider this a bug, when a package ships things which it > expects to magically disappear and where it thus cares about re-creating > them all the time. There's just no need to ship them in the package then > at all. Well... a minor bug probably :)
That's not a bug, that's fairly reasonable behavious - in the case that /var/run *isn't* a tmpfs, the package knows about the directory, the postrm script can purge stuff from it, and the directory gets cleaned away like it should. Is /var/run being *mandated* as having to be tmpfs? -- Brett Parker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
