* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061116 09:35]: > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 09:30 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061115 18:31]: > > > 1. /bin/sh can be a symbolic link to any shell. > > > > I don't think we allow to any shell - but there are more possibilities > > than just /bin/bash. > > So can we just decide what the possibilities are and then put those in > Policy and be done with it?
No, because policy doesn't work that way. There is no reason to restrict us to a list of shells - there is a reason to restrict us to a list of features. Anyways, it seems that Manoj, Russ and almost everyone else (i.e. everybody except you) agree what we should do, so I would call that a rough consensus, and just go ahead. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
