On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:35:27PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:42:47 -0500, Joe Smith > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I would hope that there would be a grace period after deactivation, > > I suggest you read the original mail before participating in > the discussion. > > > where a person who misses the WaT mail, and then later has his/her > > account disabled can quickly speak up and say they are still here, > > and be re-enabled without having to go through any sort of NM > > process. > > Now, while having a grqace period sounds like a good idea, > this appeal is couched in terms that seem (to me, at least) shrouded > in fear of _any_ NM processing. Why is that? I mean, getting ones > status reverted is an inconvenience, but surely an active DD should > not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?
A probable reason is that the NM process is getting tougher and/or that some developpers didn't even pass an NM process... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
