Le Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:36:26AM -0500, Matthias Julius a écrit : > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:13:07AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> > binNMUs though. Aren't buildds simply there to build the existing > >> > sources on other platforms? Surely some human was involved here? > >> > >> wanna-build and buildd have been modified a while back to be able to do > >> binNMU's. The only human involvement is when a given package is marked > >> in the database as 'requires a binNMU', and when the buildd admin later > >> signs the package, as usual. > > > > Would it be possible to record the name of the human that marked the > > package in debian/changelog? That would be a big help, I think (and > > hopefully avoid a discussion on debian-devel next time it happens) > > Since this is about a binNMU where the source package is not touched > and the changelog lives inside the source package how is that supposed > to be possible? > > Adding to the changelog requires a new upload.
Would it be that a bad idea ? There has been a lot of talk explaining that there is no need to leave written justifications for binNMUs, but I think that we are stil clueless about the problem it was supposed to solve in the case of Bacula... Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Wako, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]