On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 10:15:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> [Michael Hanke] > >> > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and > >> > including) powerpc are ok wrt privacy concerns. Do you agree? > >> I'm not sure if that would be the correct cutoff point, or if only > >> amd64 and i386 have enough submissions to ignore the privacy issue. > > Well, at that point what use is a per-arch stat anyway? > So porters can see what package are most usefull for that > architecture. Ok, WTF. How have four different people missed the point here that *being able to get per-arch per-package statistics only for i386 and amd64 does not give meaningful per-arch information*? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
