Hi, On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ? > madcoder mentioned in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the > intention of getting the checklib service up again: any progress? Most of the incantations of checklib did so on a per binary object basis -- which is useless in packages like fvwm, that have gazillions of plugins generated from the same CFLAGS in a global makefile. If some binary in a .deb needs it, a library can't be eliminated from build depends, so the lib minimization can't be done. Has this been fixed in the latest incantation? I ended up creating a checklib.sh that does the checking based on _all_ binary objects shipped in the package at one time; and this is what I use in my packages now. manoj -- Is this TERMINAL fun? Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]