[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> On Jun 02, Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A blatant appeal to authority in place of facts or analysis isn't
>> particularly useful information, and is even less so when arguments
>> for the contrary position have been made but not answered.
> s/arguments/opinions/

Yes, there were a number of court opinions cited to illustrate that
choice of venue (aka forum selection) clauses are quite often binding.
This was in contrast to claims from the "CDDL is DFSG compliant" crowd
that the clause had no effect.  That was one of the unanswered facts
that I had in mind -- although I suspect your shorthand was not
actually in reference to that.

Michael Poole


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to