Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hm, I was tempted to think "yes, of course", but how about foo-snapshot >> or bar-cvs? Why shouldn't they be in unstable, autobuilt > > I think that such packages are OK in unstable, but some might argue that > they should go in experimental. > >> and available as Build-Depends for baz-bzr? > > That's dangerous. baz-bzr will be allowed to transition to testing > (b-deps are not considered for testing transition), but won't be able to > build from source in testing, which is RC.
No, I don't think that's a problem. Packages which are just regular unreleased checkouts of some version control system should have a "not for release" dummy RC bug anyway. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)