On Tue, Jun 26, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think it would also be useful to include 'nostrip' and 'noopt' in the
> Build-Options field, as a way to indicate that the package implements
> those DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. I also have some Evil Plans for other things
> that can go in Build-Options, but they're not ready yet and would be OT
> in this thread.

 Why not promote these to requirements in a particular policy version
 instead?  I fear we will have to list 10 Build-Options in all packages
 in a couple of years.

-- 
Loïc Minier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to