On 26-Jul-07, 13:41 (CDT), Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 3. The actual contents and structure of the default menu in each WM etc. > > This is a matter of Policy and ENTIRELY orthogonal to issues 1 and 2. > > In particular, just saying "we're going to use the FDo format now" does > > nothing to prevent the kind of mess you see in the Debian menu. OTOH, > > setting an acceptable policy would clean up not only the GNOME menu but > > all the other menu systems. > > Except that the freedesktop.org specification comes with its own set of > categories, registration system, and classification system, which does not > match the Debian system. I suppose we could use the format without using > its categorization system, but that seems a bit strange and Debian's > current menu structure doesn't have the concept of primary and additional > categories the way that the freedesktop.org specification does.
That's okay. It's just a simple matter of policy making :-) Or, the Debian GNOME maintainers (and KDE maintainers, etc.) can just ignore the Debian menu entries and make a package of FDo menu entries for all the packages they want in their menu. Steve -- Steve Greenland The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the world. -- seen on the net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]