On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:35:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt > > Perfectly well defined.
An interesting riposte for those arguing the opposite IETF angle. If adherence to standards is so important, surely it's a net win if we respect the intended semantics of Reply-To while simultaneously embracing the Mail-Followup-To header. I don't see how you could argue one, without the other. :) -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
