On 02/11/2014 07:23 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > IMO (and I'm an interested part / GNOME dude, so no say): blocking > progress is bad. So if someone wants to add OpenRC scripts to packages > and maintenance is low: as packager you should be allowing that to > happen. As long as the time required on packagers part is minimal. Only > by not blocking progress things can move to working nicely. But that > also means that it really falls under the task of people interested in > something different to make such change happen. At the moment there is > too much "blocking progress" going on IMO
Yes, I agree with what's above. On 02/11/2014 08:13 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Yes, but we are not talking about hypothetical things. I am also not > planning my life for the case that I am winning the lottery tomorrow. Chances to win the lottery are 1 against 14 000 000 (at least in my country). Claiming this kind of odds for supporting OpenRC is IMO an overstatement, especially considering that we have LSB header scripts for *all* of our packages right now. Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52fa49b2.5020...@debian.org
