On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:17:44PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with > > > migrating git.debian.org > > > > Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab instance is one thing, > > migrating > > git.debian.org is quite another. Did I miss where there was consensus on > > this? > > it was a misunderstanding that went this way: > > * Someone wanted gitlab.debian.org. > * Someone pointed out that d.o services should be named by task, not > implementation. > * Someone figured that the task provided by gitlab is git hosting, > hence understood the above as a suggestion to use git.debian.org.
Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git / gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool because it's shiny? This has more to do with delivering sustainable services while reducing the overhead / technical debt. -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian
