On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> wrote: >On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote: >> How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force >> pushed any time and people pulling from those branches should be >> expected to handle that? > >This would be useful. > >I would already assume any branch prefixed with 'wip' might be rebased >myself, but others might be surprised.
I would like to have this documented somewhere so that people dont get surprised. I am not particularly fond of the wip-prefix though and would appreciate better suggestions. Are we on the same terminology here, myself saying a rebased and force-pushed branch while you only say rebased? Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
