Simon Richter <s...@debian.org> writes: > On 6/28/23 13:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> In that case, I don't actually know why we usually use Conflicts with >> Replaces. Maybe we don't really need to? > Replaces+Conflicts together has a special meaning, that is used for > replacing a package completely in an atomic operations, such as when a > package is being renamed. Yeah, I knew that part, but for some reason I thought we normally always combine Replaces with Breaks or Conflicts even for other cases. Maybe I just made that up and confused myself. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>