Hi Bas, On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 6/28/23 21:49, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > postgis > > qgis > > Why is postgis on this list? > > $ grep -c Replaces debian/control* > debian/control:0 > debian/control.in:0
Thanks for asking. You identified another source of false positives that slipped my mind when doing the analysis. The underlying data source did not use unstable, but every suite from bullseye to experimental including -security and -backports. As it happens, bookworm's postgresql-15-postgis-3-scripts has versioned Replaces that are not matched with Breaks or Conflicts. I don't think we are going to fix that in bookworm and you've fixed it in unstable. So yeah, this list has more false positives than originally assumed. I could improve the numbers, but to me the numbers I've given being a tight upper bound seems good enough and lintian.debian.org will give us precise and current numbers once my patch is merged. Does that seem sensible to you as well? Helmut
