On 26/09/23 at 21:35 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the context - so there is no need technical incompatibility > at play, but mostly a matter of having resources and time to do it.
I think it's worth adding that the new implementation (as part of UDD) is less ambitious on the technical level and shares a lot of code/infra/logic with other bits of UDD that are useful in other contexts (such as https://udd.debian.org/bugs/, or the scanner for new upstream versions). So the chances of long term maintainability are a bit higher than with the previous standalone implementation. Lucas
