Peter Pentchev [12/Feb 10:23pm +02] wrote: > FWIW, coming from a quite conservative person, well-known to be a very, > very late adopter among my friends... I found dgit very easy to fit into > my patches-unapplied quilt-managed packaging workflow. Pretty much > everything I have to do is, indeed, when I am satisfied with > the packaging, to run `dgit push-source`; that is all. Sometimes, e.g. > when somebody has uploaded a NMU or a team upload without using dgit > directly, I have to pass it `--trust-changelog`. And very, very, very > rarely, I have to pass it `--override`, but that mostly happens > the very first time I decide to upload a package using dgit after > I have been uploading it in other ways... and even then, these days > `--trust-changelog` works in most cases. > > My deepest thanks to Ian, Sean, and whoever else has helped make dgit > the universal, yet not so difficult to grok for basic tasks, tool that > it is today!
Thank you for this testimonial, it's encouraging and just what we are aiming for :) -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
