Hi, On Tue, 17 Mar 2026, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > This has reminded me of Raphael's (CCed) efforts to revamp DEP3 [1]. [...] > Hopefully the whole effort is not lost. It would be very good if we could > reach consensus on the issue of new-DEP or not, at least.
It's correct that I did not process the feedback received yet, it's still in my TODO list. I'm leaning towards attributing a new DEP number for this update even though it's not about entirely changing the syntax. The focus was more on the meaning of fields, on best-practice combinations, on deprecating one of the two allowed syntaxes, etc. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog <[email protected]> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
