Charles Plessy <[email protected]> writes: > I would be relieved and grateful if I could have another pair of eyes > checking https://wiki.debian.org/R/riscv64
I think you should think about who this page is aimed: your email and "When reporting regressions upstream, do not assume" makes it sound aimed at debian contributors. but "Suggestions for R packages developers" seems to be aimed at upstream (and "package" should be singular here). I think you should ask yoursekf: what is the ask of upstream? - are you asking them to change how NaN is handled in R? - to solve debian-specific bugs? - to accept patches? - something else? (The first section is labelled "executive summary" - but it's not a summary of and is not aimed at "executives"). > before it reaches outside Debian circles. i dont think people outside debian will find it easy to understand things like like "Regressions that only trigger on riscv64 can block migration to testing and cascade to many reverse-dependencies." - bluntly, from the start, i gather R doesnt support riscv64 at all: so why should they care?
