On Mon, 2026-10-26 at 14:42 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> I have been shown by others that, without an announcement, NEW queue 
> processing
> now seems to throw my upload at an LLM. From the review results:

  I too, noticed this change about a week ago and have had a draft
email that I've been hesitating to send, but I guess you beat me to
pressing that "send" button. The rest of this email is largely
excerpted from that unsent draft.

  I second Johannes' concerns about this being rolled out without any
wider discussion. If individual DFSG Team members want to use LLMs in
their review of packages, more power to them. Feel free to have an army
of thousands of agents cross-checking each other. But the review I
receive on the other side of the NEW process if a package is rejected
or maybe needs a slight touch-up should be succinct and to the point.

  Picking at random a successful[0] and unsuccessful[1] LLM-generated
review from the dashboard, the successful review consists of 734 words
(~2.5 printed pages) and the unsuccessful review weighs in at a
whopping 1,535 words (~5 printed pages). I haven't tried to fully read
either report, nor spend brain cycles checking if the LLM output is
legitimate or not. I just want to emphasize the many orders of
magnitude change in review size that's being generated, and that
uploaders may need to spend time trying to review and understand in
this new process.

  I also want to point out there appears to be a penalty for anyone
uploading to NEW who chooses to ignore LLM-generated complaints[2] and
a bonus for uploads which make the LLM happy[3].

  My concern is that this change by the DFSG Team is now forcing every
Debian contributor who has a package that goes through the NEW queue to
interact with LLM-generated content. As best as I know, this is the
first such significant change to any Debian-wide process since the
passing of the GR.

Mathias

[0] -- https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/node-comlink#assistant-report
[1] -- 
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/gumbo-parser/0.14.1+dfsg-1/d6d8eeaa665a5de675852125618e4a141646c2e6732bb62ecbc09ae712abc05c
[2] -- https://salsa.debian.org/dfsg-team/dfsg-new-queue/-/merge_requests/263
[3] -- https://salsa.debian.org/dfsg-team/dfsg-new-queue/-/merge_requests/267

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to