Le Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 08:58:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Since the DFSG team is using a tool to analyze packages at upload time > anyway, I think that it makes sense to provide that report to > maintainers, so that they can react without waiting for a human review, > similarly to how maintainers react to CI results. > > I don't see the point in hiding those reports. If some maintainers > prefer to wait until another human confirmed the diagnosis, that's fine, > but why penalize those who welcome early feedback?
Because this is not a feedback _from the project_. Developers will feel their packages will be rejected unless they comply with the LLM demand, even though the LLM report is not in accordance with Debian policy, and thus is arbitrary. LLM have tremendous power of persuasion, especially when they are in the wrong. This can even affect the DFSG reviewers, that can get convinced the diagnosis is correct when it is wrong. This is not theoretical at all, I have shown examples. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
