On Tuesday, October 27, 2026 12:58:15 PM Mountain Standard Time Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Since the DFSG team is using a tool to analyze packages at upload time > anyway, I think that it makes sense to provide that report to > maintainers, so that they can react without waiting for a human review, > similarly to how maintainers react to CI results. > > I don't see the point in hiding those reports. If some maintainers > prefer to wait until another human confirmed the diagnosis, that's fine, > but why penalize those who welcome early feedback?
That’s my feeling as well. I, personally, like these reviews. I consider them similar to lintian or Salsa CI. They are only checking things where the AI has a high likelihood of correctly identifying problems. They catch common mistakes and provide helpful hints for fixing them. Most importantly, they do not make any final decisions. If the AI did make rejections decisions, then I would be concerned. But as it is, this is a helpful tool that both the submitter and the reviewer can use to make their jobs easier. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
