Greetings. Theodore Tso - 27.10.26, 04:25:46 CET: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 10:33:24AM -0500, Ben Finney wrote: > > Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]> writes: > > > One of the greater challenges with LLMs seems to be to guide them to > > > produce concise, accurate and to the point output. > > > > Until that day comes (if ever), I agree with other posters: This > > unreliable and non-deterministic machine should not be sending > > messages > > unsolicited to Debian package maintainers. > > Humans are unrelible and non-deterministic, you know. The real > question is whether advisory messages are useful enough if they will > be helpful to developers / engineers / maintainers. > > In the kernel world, the vast majority of subsystem maintainers have > elected to enable AI generated code reviews. […]
But in kernel world maintainers can choose? Then as asked by someone else in this thread already - even on Salsa: Would be nice to have that here as well. Allow package maintainers to choose. As for teams, teams could try to reach an consensus and choose for the team. Best, -- Martin
