On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 05:04:38PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Theodore Tso <[email protected]> [261027 16:36]: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 11:17:12AM -0500, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > > In the kernel world, the vast majority of subsystem maintainers have > > > > elected to enable AI generated code reviews. […] > > > > > > But in kernel world maintainers can choose? > > > > Subsystem maintainers can choose whether Sashiko reviews go to just > > themselves, or to the patch submitters, or the entire mailing list. > > Patch submitteres can choose to delete the Sashiko Reviews, if they so > > choose. > > I imagine the kernel community did not have a GR about Sashiko usage though?
Not our concern, not a Debian concern. Concern of Debian is our social contract, that we care about libre software. And we value people more. Thing is how we use our tooling. Forgetting that there is a recieving end when we transmit is mis-use of tooling. Current discussion proofs we, Debian, still have two-way-communication. I have faith we will tune processing NEW further. Regards Geert Stappers Was earlier today ask what my opinion on this is, replied with "All sides have valid points". -- Silence is hard to parse
