Quoting [email protected] (2026-11-11 19:50:51) > On Nov 11, 2026 16:32, Ian Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > So my agenda here [ not-funny taken-out-of-context remark stripped ] > > is to limit the broad-scale use of LLMs in Debian to > > situations where we have consensus, *as decided by the GR*. > > But not everyone agrees with your lecture of the GR proposition 5 that won. > > It has in it: > " > Debian continues to rely on the judgment and responsibility of its individual > contributors. Project members are expected to exercise appropriate care > " > AND a consensus part. So which one is it? Some may argue on the direction of > individual own judgment.
You mean Debian is not consensus-driven - votes are just theater, and we don't try to find any common ground? I disagree. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
